ORIGINAL PAPER
Influence of Nozzle Geometry on Fluid Flow Parameters
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086, Tallinn, Estonia
 
 
Online publication date: 2020-11-26
 
 
Publication date: 2020-12-01
 
 
International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2020;25(4):214-222
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The article discusses ways for optimization of a standard nozzle cup design to achieve a narrower paint flow. The analysis of a standard nozzle cup shows that distribution of air pressure is critically uneven both along the nozzle axis and in the radial direction. A decrease in pressure is about 45% at the distance of 2 mm from the front surface of the nozzle cup. Air pressure decreases about 40% at the distance of 2 mm from the nozzle axis in the radial direction. Air velocity decreases about 52% at the distance of 4 mm from nozzle surface but then the velocity stabilizes and decreases is about 59% at the distance of 10 mm from the nozzle surface in comparison to its magnitude on the nozzle surface. Six extra holes and a circular rim were added to the standard nozzle cup to obtain paint stream as narrow as possible. Also was modified inner surface of the nuzzle cup. Totally, four different components were analysed. The results show that with increasing the nozzle cone by fifteen or more degrees, the pressure distribution decreases. Most optimal solution has six small holes around the nozzle hole and a small rim covering all holes. In this case, pressure decreases only 3% in the axial direction and 4% in the radial direction at the distance of 2 mm from the front surface of the nozzle. Distribution of air velocity is still significant but its magnitude is about 35% … 45% less than at the standard nozzle cup.
 
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Steffens H.–D., Babiak Z. and Wewel M. (1990): Recent developments in arc spraying. – IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., vol.18, No.6, pp.974-979.
 
2.
Thorpe M.L. (1998): Thermal spray applications grow.– Advanced Materials and Processes, vol.134, No.4, pp.69-70.
 
3.
Wang X., Heberlein J., Pfender E. and Gerberich W. (1999): Effect of nozzle configuration, gas pressure, and gas type on coating properties in wire arc spray. – Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, vol.8, No.4, pp.565–575.
 
4.
Wang X., Heberlein J., Pfender E. and W. Gerberich W. (1996): Effect of gas velocity and particle velocity on coating adhesion in wire arc spraying. – Proceedings of the Ninth National Thermal Spray Conference, Cincinnati, pp.807-811.
 
5.
Steffens H.D. and Nassenstein K. (1999): Influence of the spray velocity on arcs prayed coating structures. – Journal of Thermal Spray Technol., pp.454-460.
 
6.
Gedzevicius I. and Valiulis A.V. (2003): Influence of the particles velocity on the arc spraying coating adhesion valiulis. – Materials Science (Medziagotyra), vol.9, No.4 pp.334-337.
 
7.
Gedzevicius I. and Valiulis A.V. (2006): Analysis of wire arc spraying process variables on coatings properties. – Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol.175, No.1-3, pp.206-211.
 
8.
Bruhns S. and Werther J. (2005): An investigation of the mechanism of liquid injection into fluidized beds. – AIChE Journal, vol.51, No.3, pp.766-775.
 
9.
Ariyapadi S., Holdsworth D., Norley C., Berruti F. and Briens C. (2002): Digital X-ray imaging technique to study the horizontal injection of gas–liquid jets into fluidized beds. – International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, vol.1, No.1, A56.
 
10.
McDougall S., Saberian M., Briens C., Berruti F. and Chan E. (2005): Effect of liquid properties on the agglomerating tendency of a wet gas–solid fluidized bed. – Powder Technology, vol.149, No.2-3, pp.61-67.
 
11.
House P.K., Saberian M., Briens C., Berruti F. and Chan E. (2004): Injection of a liquid spray into a fluidized bed: particle-liquid mixing and impact on fluid cooker yields. – Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol.43, No.18, pp.5663-5669.
 
12.
McMillan J., Zhou D., Ariyapadi S., Briens C. and Berruti F. (2005): Characterization of the contact between liquid spray droplets and particles in a fluidized bed. – Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol.44, No.14, pp.4931-4939.
 
13.
Portoghese F., Ferrante L., Berruti F., Briens C. and Chan E. (2008): Effect of injection-nozzle operating parameters on the interaction between a gas–liquid jet and a gas–solid fluidized bed. – Powder Technology, vol.184, No.1, pp.1-10.
 
14.
Wallis G.B. (1969): One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow. – McGraw-Hill.
 
15.
Cammarata L., Lettieri P., Micale G. and Colman D. (2002): 2D and 3D CFD simulations of bubbling fluidized beds using Eulerian-Eulerian models. – International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, vol.1, No.1, A48.
 
16.
Akbar N.S., Ali Khan L. and Hayat Khan Z. (2016): Natural convective flow analysis for nanofluids with Reynold’s model of viscosity. – International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, vol.14, No.5, pp.1101-1111.
 
17.
Penkov I. and Aleksandrov D. (2017): Analysis and study of the influence of the geometrical parameters of mini unmanned quad-rotor helicopters to optimise energy saving. – International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, vol.14, No.4, pp.4730-4746.
 
18.
Industrial finishing innovations, spraying methods. http://www.itwif.com, 2017.
 
eISSN:2353-9003
ISSN:1734-4492
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top