ORIGINAL PAPER
Parametric Investigation of an Assessed Subcritical Dual-Pressure Evaporation Organic Rankine Cycles Based on Different Heat Source Temperatures
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Malaysia
2
Department of Crop Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Malaysia
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2025-09-05
Final revision date: 2026-01-24
Acceptance date: 2026-06-02
Online publication date: 2026-08-14
Corresponding author
Omid Rowshanaie
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Malaysia
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The dual-pressure evaporation Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) consists of two compression processes, two evaporation processes, and two expansion processes, and is becoming more prevalent than single-pressure evaporation ORCs due to its higher performance and maximum net power output. This study investigates different heat sources analysis in a simulated parametric dual-pressure evaporation ORC according to the assessment design process. The current dual-pressure evaporation ORC makes a comparison between R245fa, an old refrigerant, and R1233zd(E), a substitute for R245fa, as working fluids, paying attention to three water temperatures (100, 125, and 150 ºC) as a heat source to generate maximum net power output. Based on designing an assessment process for dual-pressure evaporation ORC at 100 °C and 125 °C heat sources, R1233zd(E) is compared with R245fa, revealing an improvement of 9.58 kW and 16.14 kW in maximum net power output. Furthermore, according to the first and second laws of efficiency, R1233zd(E) exhibits improvements of 0.09% and 0.56%, as well as 0.15% and 1.04%, respectively. The pressure rise in low and high-pressure compression processes, parallel with a higher exergy flow rate in evaporation processes of R1233zd(E), demonstrates a direct and positive influence with a maximum net power output. At 150 °C, the power generated by the lower-pressure turbine improved by 28.1 kW in R1233zd(E) compared with R245fa.
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Li B., Xie H., Sun L., Gao T., Xia E., Liu B., Wang J. and Long X. (2025): Advanced exergy analysis and multi-objective optimization of dual-loop ORC utilizing LNG cold energy and geothermal energy.– Renewable Energy, vol.239, No.122164, pp.1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene....
2.
Hu X., Ma T., Dong Sh., Zhang Ch., Zhuang W. and Zhang T. (2025): Design and selection of working fluids for ORC system using computer-aided molecular design and group contribution method.– Applied Thermal Engineering, vol.274, No.126593, pp.1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appl....
3.
Zahedi R. and Ahmadi A. (2025): Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of solar derived ORC with storage system utilizing PCM.– Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, vol.68, No.105942, pp.1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csit....
4.
Feng Y.-Q., Wang Zh.-X., Xu K.-J., Yang Zh.-Zh., Liu M.-Y., Wu H.-J., Wang Y.-Zh. and He Zh.-X. (2025): Data-driven multi-objective optimization of surfactant-modified nano-organic working fluids for enhanced heat transfer in ORC phase-change processes.– Energy Conversion and Management, vol.333, No.119815, pp.1-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enco....
5.
Eyerer S, Wieland Ch, Vandersickel A and Spliethoff H (2016): Experimental study of an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) and analysis of R1233zd-E as a drop-in replacement for R245fa for low temperature heat utilization.– Energy, vol.103, pp.660-671.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
6.
Eyerer S., Dawo F., Kaindl J., Wieland Ch. and Spliethoff H. (2019): Experimental investigation of modern ORC working fluids R1224yd(Z) and R1233zd(E) as replacements for R245fa.– Applied Energy, vol.240, pp.946-963.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
7.
Li J., Peng X., Yang Zh., Hu Sh. and Duan Y. (2022): Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review.– Applied Energy, vol.311, No.118609, pp.1-24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
8.
Li J., Ge Zh., Liu Q., Duan Y. and Yang Zh. (2018): Thermo-economic performance analyses and comparison of two turbine layouts for organic Rankine cycles with dual-pressure evaporation.– Energy Conversion and Management, vol.164, pp.603-614.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enco....
9.
Wang M., Zhang J., Zhao S., Liu Q., Zhao Y. and Wu H. (2019): Performance investigation of transcritical and dual-pressure Organic Rankine Cycles from the aspect of thermal match.– Energy Conversion and Management, vol.197, No.111850, pp.1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enco....
10.
Li J., Ge Zh., Duan Y. and Yang Zh. (2019): Effects of heat source temperature and mixture composition on the combined superiority of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle and zeotropic mixtures.– Energy, vol.174, pp.436-449.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
11.
Li J., Ge Zh., Duan Y., Yang Zh. and Liu Q. (2018): Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles.– Applied Energy, vol.217, pp.409-421.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apen....
12.
Manente G., Lazzaretto A. and Bonamico E. (2017): Design guidelines for the choice between single and dual pressure layouts in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems.– Energy, vol.123, pp.413-431.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
13.
Li D., He Zh., Wang Q., Wang X., Wu W. and Xing Z. (2021): Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a partial evaporating dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle system for low-grade heat recovery.– Applied Thermal Engineering, vol.185, No.116363, pp.1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appl....
14.
Zheng Zh., Cao J., Wu W. and Leung M.K.H. (2022): Parallel and in-series arrangements of zeotropic dual-pressure Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low-grade waste heat recovery.– Energy Reports, vol.8, pp.2630-2645.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr....
15.
Fu B.-R., Lee Y.-R. and Hsieh J.-Ch. (2015): Design, construction, and preliminary results of a 250-kW organic Rankine cycle system.– App. Thermal Eng., vol.80, pp.239-346.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appl....