ORIGINAL PAPER
Digital Materials – Evaluation of the Possibilities of using Selected Hyperelastic Models to Describe Constitutive Relations
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Machine Design Fundamentals, Warsaw University of Technology, Narbutta Str. 84, 02-524, Warsaw, Poland
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-09-09
 
 
Publication date: 2017-08-01
 
 
International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2017;22(3):601-612
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The authors tried to identify the parameters of numerical models of digital materials, which are a kind of composite resulting from the manufacture of the product in 3D printers. With the arrangement of several heads of the printer, the new material can result from mixing of materials with radically different properties, during the process of producing single layer of the product. The new material has properties dependent on the base materials properties and their proportions. Digital materials tensile characteristics are often non-linear and qualify to be described by hyperelastic materials models. The identification was conducted based on the results of tensile tests models, its various degrees coefficients of the polynomials to various degrees coefficients of the polynomials. The Drucker’s stability criterion was also examined. Fourteen different materials were analyzed.
 
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Popescu G. (2007): Digital Materials for Digital Fabrication. – http://cba.mit.edu/docs/theses..., (acces 02.02.2016).
 
2.
Siemiński P. and Budzik G. (2015): Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, 3D printers. – Warsaw: Publishing House of the Warsaw University of Technology.
 
3.
Stratasys. (2015): PolyJet Technology. – http://www.stratasys.com/3d-pr..., (acces 10.20.2015).
 
4.
Zhou C., Chen Y., Yang Z. and Behrokh K. (2011): Development of a Multi-material Mask-Image-Projection-based Stereolithography for the Fabrication of Digital Materials. – In: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 2011, https://sffsymposium.engr.utex..., (12.05.2016).
 
5.
Hiller J. and Lipson H. (2009): Design and analysis of digital materials for physical 3D voxel printing. – Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol.15, pp.137-149.
 
6.
Reichl K. and Inman D. (2016): Dynamic modulus properties of Objet Connex 3D Printer digital materials. – In: Topics in Modal Analysis & Testing, Volume 10: Proceedings of the 34th IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics 2016 (M. Mains).
 
7.
Łąpieś Z., Żrodowski Ł. and Siemiński P. (2015): Mechanical And Microstructural Analysis of PolyJet Matrix Digital Materials. – In: Proceedings of the International Conference “Methods & Tools for CAE - Concepts and Applications”. - Bochnia: Warsaw University of Technology.
 
8.
Stratasys. (2015): PolyJet Materials Data Sheet. – http://usglobalimages.stratasy..., (acces 10.20.2015).
 
9.
EN ISO 527-2. (1996): Determination of tensile properties of plastics.
 
10.
Boyce M. and Arruda E. (1993): A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behawior of rubber elastic materials. – Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, pp.389-412.
 
11.
Guo Z. and Shuys L. (2008): Constitutive modeling of hyperelastic rubber-like materials. – Heron, (53), pp.109-132.
 
12.
Chandrasekharaiah D. and Debnath L. (1994): Continuum Mechanics. – London: Academic Press Limited.
 
13.
Boyce M. and Arruda E. (2000): Constitutive models of rubber elasticity: a review. – Rubber Chemistry and Technology, (73), pp.504-523.
 
14.
Dassault Systèmes. (2013): Abaqus Analysis User's Guide.
 
15.
Jemioło S. (2002): Study of hyperelastic properties of isotropic materials, modeling and numerical implementation (Vol. “Building” No.140). – Warsaw: Publishing House of the Warsaw University of Technology.
 
eISSN:2353-9003
ISSN:1734-4492
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top