ORIGINAL PAPER
CENTRAL HOLE SIZE INFLUENCES A FATIGUE CRACK BEHAVIOR OF Al7050-T6 ALLOY
More details
Hide details
1
Applied Mechanics Technical Engineering Department, Middle Technical University/ Technical Engineering College-Baghdad, Iraq
2
Materials Technical Engineering Department, Middle Technical University/ Technical Engineering College-Baghdad, Iraq
Submission date: 2025-06-03
Final revision date: 2025-07-30
Acceptance date: 2025-12-02
Online publication date: 2026-03-16
Publication date: 2026-03-16
Corresponding author
Mohammed A. N Ali
Applied Mechanics Technical Engineering Department, Middle Technical University/ Technical Engineering College-Baghdad, Al-Zafarania, 10074, Baghdad, Iraq
International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2026;31(1):1-15
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This research studied experimentally the behavior of an aluminum alloy 7050 thin plate containing different sizes of circular central holes under thermo-mechanical fatigue crack growth testing. Transient thermal cyclic loading from 50℃ to 200℃ where applied, combined with constant tensile mechanical load at 200 kg at the edge of the plate. Three cases were experimentally tested based on the hole diameter of (1, 2, 3 mm) under the same testing conditions. Results show the increment of central hole diameter makes the crack initiation start earlier and crack growth increases then goes faster. Also, it has increased the stress intensity. The length of the second region of crack propagation related to stress intensity decreased when the hole size increased, and the slope changed too. For that, different Paris laws were obtained based on the central hole size. Accordingly, to these Paris laws, it can be easily informed and analyzed the behavior of any engineering structure made of this type of alloy under the same loading condition and predict its fracture or failure limits or lives.
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Ali M.A., Hasan S.T. and Myriounis D.P. (2012): A method of analysis to estimate thermal down-shock stress profiles in hollow cylinders when subjected to transient heat/cooling cycle.– Advanced Materials Research, vol.445, pp.893-898, DOI: 10.4028/scientific5/AMR.445.893.
2.
Garden C.A., Mc Evily A.J. and Wells C.H. (1973): Fatigue at elevated temperature.– American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM STP 520.
3.
Szmytka F., Salem M., Rezai-Aria F. and Oudin A., (2015): Thermal fatigue analysis of automotive Diesel piston: Experimental procedure and numerical protocol.– International Journal of Fatigue, vol.73, pp.48-57, DOI: 10.1016/J.IJFATIGUE.2014.11.011.
4.
Muthukumaran R., Daniel A.A., Nithya M., Parthiban A., Sathish T., Giri J. and Al-Lohedan H.A. (2024): Characterization on properties of Al7050/TiC/BN hybrid metal matrix composite.– AIP Advances, vol.14, No.045318, DOI: 10.1063/5.0204280.
5.
Abo El-Nasr A., Ayad M. and Fattouh M. (2002): High temperature fatigue behavior of 7075Al via low plasticity burnishing.– Engineering Research Journal, vol.25, No.2, DOI: 10.21608/erjm.2002.70750.
6.
Chaussumier M., Mabru C., Chieragatti R, and Shahzad M. (2013): Fatigue life model for 7050 chromic anodized aluminium alloy.– Procedia Engineering, vol.66, pp.300-312, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.085.
7.
Engler-Pinto Jr. C.C., Lasecki J.V., Boileau J.M. and Allison J.E. (2004): A comparative investigation on the high temperature fatigue of three cast aluminum alloys.– SAE International Technical Paper Series, DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-1029.
8.
Liu K., Wang S., Pan L. and Chen X.-G. (2023): Thermo-mechanical fatigue behavior and resultant microstructure evolution in Al-Si 319 and 356 cast alloys.– Materials, vol.16, No.2, p.829, DOI: 10.3390/ma16020829.
9.
Mahan H.M., Konovalov S.V., Najm S.M., Oleksik M. and Trzepieciński T. (2024): Experimental and numerical investigations of the fatigue life of AA2024 aluminium alloy based nanocomposite reinforced by TiO2 nanoparticles under the effect of heat treatment.– International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 5, pp.141-153, DOI: 10.1007/s12541-023-00906-4.
10.
Abdallah S., Mohamed E., and El-Amine Slimani M. (2019): Crack growth study under thermo-mechanical loads: parametric analysis for 2024 T3 aluminum alloy.– Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, vol.13, No.50, pp.235-245, DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.19.
11.
Hussain F., Abdullah S. and Nuawi M.Z. (2016): Effect of temperature on fatigue life behaviour of aluminium alloy AA6061 using analytical approach.– Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences (JMES), vol.10, No.3, pp.2324-2235, DOI: 10.15282/jmes.10.3.2016.10.0216.
12.
Kadhim M.J. and Kamal H.M. (2018): cumulative thermal fatigue damage for aluminum alloy under variable stresses.– International Conference on Materials Engineering and Science, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol.454, No.1, p.012145, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/454/1/012145.
13.
Jones R.M. (1998): Mechanics of Composite Materials.– Second Edition Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksurg, Virginia, 24061-0219.
14.
Singer F.L. and Pytel A. (1980): Strength of materials.– third edition, Harper and Row, publishers, New York.
15.
Davis J.R. (2001): Aluminum and aluminum alloys.– Alloying: Understanding the Basics, ASM International, pp.351-416.
16.
Ragab A. and Bayoumi S. (1998): Engineering Solid Mechanics.– CRC press, p.994.