ORIGINAL PAPER
MOGA-Based Optimization and Performance Comparison of Plain and Multi-Lobe Hydrodynamic Journal Bearings
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, METs Institute of Engineering, India
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-03-25
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-05-28
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-09-10
 
 
Online publication date: 2025-12-05
 
 
Publication date: 2025-12-05
 
 
Corresponding author
Nitin B. Ahire   

Department of Mechanical Engineering, METs Institute of Engineering, Adgaon, 422003, Nashik, India
 
 
International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2025;30(4):1-17
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Choosing the best hydrodynamic journal bearing (HJB) involves a complex multi-objective optimization challenge that requires balancing load-carrying capacity (LCC), friction loss, oil film temperature increase, and dynamic stability. This research utilizes the multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) to optimize plain, two-lobe, three-lobe, and four-lobe journal bearings under different operating conditions. The variable parameters of HJBs, including rotational speed, clearance, L/D ratio, and load, were taken into account. The optimization process utilized Pareto-based selection, simulated binary crossover, and Gaussian mutation techniques to determine the optimal bearing choice. The three-lobe bearing proved to be the most suitable choice based on its superior load-carrying capacity, minimal temperature rise, reduced friction loss, and overall stability performance. The findings reveal that the four-lobe bearing excels in LCC, while the plain and two-lobe bearings are advantageous for their simple design and low manufacturing costs. These results offer valuable insights for engineers and designers in choosing the most appropriate bearing type based on specific operational needs and performance trade-offs.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Abass B., Ahmed S.Y. and Kadhim Z.H. (2023): Analysis and optimization of nanolubricated journal bearing under thermoelasto-hydrodynamic lubrication considering cavitation effect.– Tribology in Industry, vol.45, No.4, pp.618-633, https://doi.org/10.24874/ti.14....
 
2.
Hirani H. (2004): Multiobjective optimization of a journal bearing using the Pareto optimality concept.– Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, vol.218, No.4, pp.323-336, https://doi.org/10.1243/135065....
 
3.
Bouyer J., Fillon M. and Pierre-Danos I. (2006): Influence of wear on the behavior of a two-lobe HJB subjected to numerous startups and stops.– Journal of Tribology - Transactions of the ASME, vol.129, No.2, pp.205-208, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2401....
 
4.
Chen Y., Feng J., Sun Y., Peng X., Dai Q. and Yu C. (2019): Effect of groove shape on the hydrodynamic lubrication of journal bearing considering cavitation.– Engineering Computations, vol.37, No.5, pp.1557-1576, https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-06-....
 
5.
Pinkus O. (1956): Analysis of elliptical bearings.– Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol.78, No.5, pp.965-972.
 
6.
Dhande D.Y., Lanjewar G.H. and Pande D.W. (2018): Implementation of CFD-FSI technique coupled with response surface optimization method for analysis of three-lobe hydrodynamic journal bearing.– Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, vol.100, No.6, pp.955-966, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032....
 
7.
Dhande D.Y., Pande D.W. and Lanjewar G.H. (2018): Numerical analysis of three-lobe HJB using CFD-GA technique based on response surface evaluation.– Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol.40, No.8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430....
 
8.
Biswas N., Chakraborti P. and Dhar P. (2016): Optimization of pressure and oil film thickness in multilobe bearing using response surface methodology and MOGA. – International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol.6, No.3, pp.56-62.
 
9.
Vinh D.P. (2022): Effect of loaded-pad thickness on the static behaviors of five-pad hydrodynamic journal bearings. – Journal of Science and Technology Issue on Information and Communications Technology, pp.15-19, DOI:10.31130/ud-jst.2022.503E.
 
10.
Shinde A.B. and Pawar P.M. (2017): Multi-objective optimization of surface textured journal bearing by Taguchi-based Grey relational analysis. – Tribology International, vol.114, pp.349-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trib....
 
11.
Dang R.K., Goyal D., Chauhan A. and Dhami S.S. (2021): Numerical and experimental studies on performance enhancement of journal bearings using nanoparticles-based lubricants.– Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, pp.1-29, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831....
 
12.
Yang J. and Palazzolo A. (2022): Deep convolutional autoencoder augmented CFD thermal analysis of bearings with inter pad groove mixing.– International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol.188, 122639, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhe....
 
13.
Yadav S.K., Khatri C.B., Kumar A. and Chaturvedi S. (2024): Optimization of twin grooved two-lobe textured hydrodynamic journal bearing design by using genetic algorithm.– Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol.238, No.20, pp.10205-10221, https://doi.org/10.1177/095440....
 
14.
de Castro H.F., de Paula E.H. and Visnadi L.B. (2024): Reliability-based design optimization applied to a rotor supported by hydrodynamic bearings.– Machines, vol.12, No.4, p.233, https://doi.org/10.3390/machin....
 
15.
Zhao J., Li Y., Li Y. and Liu J. (2025): Multi-objective optimization of tribological properties of diesel engine camshaft bearings. – Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol.68, No.1, pp.1-17, DOI:10.1007/s00158-024-03959-9.
 
16.
Joy N.M. and Roy L. (2016): Determination of optimum configuration among different configurations of two-axial groove hydrodynamic bearings.– Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, vol.230, No.9, pp.1071-1091, https://doi.org/10.1177/135065....
 
17.
Bhagat C. and Roy L. (2014): Steady state thermo-hydrodynamic analysis of two-axial groove and multilobe hydrodynamic bearings. – Tribology in Industry, vol.36, No.4.
 
18.
Das B.J. and Roy L. (2018): Analysis and comparison of steady-state performance characteristics of two-axial groove and multilobe hydrodynamic bearings lubricated with non-Newtonian fluids. – Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, vol.232, No.12, pp.1581-1596.
 
19.
Dewangan A., Bhagat S. and Jha V. (2016): Minimization of power loss in plain journal bearings using genetic algorithms. – International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, vol.11, No.3, pp.2093-2099.
 
20.
Zhang Y., He L., Yang J., Zhu G., Jia X. and Yan W. (2021): Multi-objective optimization design of a novel integral squeeze film bearing damper.– Machines, vol.9, No.10, p.206, https://doi.org/10.3390/machin....
 
21.
Shaltout M.L. and Hegazi H.A. (2021): Multi-objective design optimization of hydrodynamic journal bearings using a hybrid approach.– Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, vol.73, No.7, pp.1052-1060, https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-05....
 
22.
Roy L. and Kakoty S.K. (2014): Application of genetic algorithm in optimization of hydrodynamic bearings.– Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp.207-217, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81....
 
23.
Banerjee P., Karri R.R., Mukhopadhyay A. and Das P. (2021): Review of soft computing techniques for modeling, design, and prediction of wastewater removal performance. – Soft Computing Techniques in Solid Waste and Wastewater Management, pp.55-73, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0....
 
24.
Deb K., Pratap A., Agarwal S. and Meyarivan T.A.M.T. (2002): A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. – IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol.6, No.2, pp.182-197.
 
eISSN:2353-9003
ISSN:1734-4492
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top