ORIGINAL PAPER
Cable-Stayed Cantilever Structures As An Expat Of Unique Application In The Construction Of A Building Located In Seismic Area – An Author’s Project Of Multifunctional Building In Lisbon, Portugal
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, ul. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, POLAND
 
2
Department of Technical Bases of Architectural Design, Faculty of Architecture, Gdansk University of Technology, ul. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, POLAND
 
 
Online publication date: 2015-12-10
 
 
Publication date: 2015-12-01
 
 
International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2015;20(4):805-816
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The article presents numerical simulations for the modelling of seismic impact on the structure of unique cantilever cablestayed structure with the application of two methods. The Response Spectrum method, in which a spectrum of the structure’s responses to an earthquake’s impact is generated, and the Accelerogram method, in which we generate dynamic load in the form of a diagram of the connection between acceleration and time for the actual readings during a real earthquake. Both methods have been presented for the El Centro earthquake spectrum. This unique application of a cantilever cablestayed structure in public buildings will allow to assess the safety of this kind of load-bearing system in areas of increased risk of seismic activity. Cantilever cablestayed structures have so far never been designed or analyzed on seismically active areas. Based on numerical simulation we determined the effect of stiffness of load-bearing lines on the increase of stresses and displacements at cable stays joint with the end of the cantilever part of a building.
 
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Antecki P. and Wdowicki J. (2007): Building high-Di Wang Tower - Static, dynamic calculations and construction. – Poznan University of Technology.
 
2.
Balendra T. (1993): Vibration of Buildings to Wind and Earthquake Loads. – London: Springer – Verlag.
 
3.
Englekirk R.T. (2003): Seismic Design of Reinforced and Precast Concrete Buildings. – Wiley.
 
4.
Harries K.A. and Gong B. (2000): Behavior and design of reinforced concrete, steel and steel-concrete coupling beams. – Earthquake Spectra, vol.16, No.4, pp.775-800.
 
5.
Kapela M. and Sieczkowski J. (2003): Designing high multi-storey buildings. – Warsaw University of Technology.
 
6.
Li Q.S., Xiao Y.Q. and Wrong C.K. (2003): Field measurements of wind effects on the tallest building in Hong Kong. – Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, vol.12, Wiley.
 
7.
Łapko A. and Jensen B.Ch. (2006): The Designing Basis and Calculation Algorithms for the Reinforced Concrete Structures. – Warsaw: Arkady.
 
8.
Paulay T. and Priestley M.J.N. (1990): Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonary Buildings. – New York: Wiley.
 
9.
Pawłowski A.Z. (2004): High buildings - the increasing role of concrete. – Construction, Technologies, Architecture, No.1(25), Publisher: Polish Cement Sp. z o.o..
 
10.
Wen Z.P., Hu Y.X. and Chau K.T. (2002): Site effect on vulnerability of high-rise shear wall buildings under near and far field earthquakes. – Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol.22, Elsevier.
 
11.
Wu J.R. and Li Q.S. (2003): Structural performance of multi-outrigger-braced tall buildings buildings. – The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, vol.12, No.2, Wiley.
 
eISSN:2353-9003
ISSN:1734-4492
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top